![]() Hence, full references in the text are not necessary A reference list is an obligatory part of a dissertation, a Bachelor’s thesis, and Master’s thesis. More difficult to manage and more time-consuming than Harvard referencing Additional comments would fragment the text, but there might be cases where such comments are necessary Harvard Referencing is restricted to the use of academic sources as it is not possible to describe sources in detail Insufficient information when using Harvard referencing, short references do not tell much about the nature of the source cited Easier for the reader to judge sources straightaway without having to look them up in the reference list Sources can be described in greater detail than in Harvard referencing Allows the use of footnotes for comments, references to further readings, examples etc. If a source is quoted for the first time, a full reference must be given to ensure that sources are identified easily Less work in comparison to creating footnotes Footnotes are not permitted in Harvard referencing: prevents you from transferring interesting parts No doubling of full references with Harvard referencing: the short references are directly linked to the reference list Harvard referencing is easy to put into practice, no need to create footnotes for referencing ![]() Short references in the text, use of superscripts to refer to sources in the reference list (similar to footnotes), author and year in the text if need be Short references in the text, author-title system and footnote system ![]() Short references in the text, author-year system, explicit footnote system as an alternative History, Literature, Anthropology, Science of Art Author-year system, no footnotes, short references in the text
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |